David Bryant wrote: > > I agree that handling the correction files would be great. Unfortunately, in > this case the problem is resources. Handling the correction files takes > about an additional 40% CPU cycles on the PC, and that doesn't take into > account the extra disk reading. In WavPack's "high" mode that would put us > at 100% boost ratio (without any dsp functions on), and even the default > mode would be pretty boosty.
Ah well, I figured it'd probably be impractical. Still, if you ever develop a sudden bout of masochism... ;) Christi
