Mike Holden wrote: > Dave Hooper wrote: >> Even that would require still storing multiple copies of each word as >> intonation and stress differs in different usage etc. Splitting each word >> once and splicin >> g would sound VERY unnatural > > Better for it to sound slightly unnatural and still fit, than for it to > not work at all. IMO
Thing is, the limit is only relevant to the Archos (and the ifp7xx) targets, so it'd be a severe step back for anyone using one of the newer targets with no gain (to them). -- Jonas H rasher(at)rasher(dot)dk
