2008/8/22 Manuel Dejonghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 3:30 AM, Francisco Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello, >> I own an ipod nano 1st gen with 4GB. This model doesn't seem to be supported. > > I also own a 1st gen 4GB nano (black) which is running RockBox at the > very moment. There is certainly no general lack of support. > > ~lImbus
Mine is white, probably that's why it doesn't work :-D :-D Last time I looked, this was the situation: (my question is if this has changed since then) Faulty playback on Ipod Nano 4Gb 1st Gen (Read 6061 times) http://forums.rockbox.org/index.php?topic=11817.90 Latest Rockbox not working on Nano (Read 9817 times) http://forums.rockbox.org/index.php?topic=11504.165 >People that want a workaround for this will have to do it themselves... etc People with a 4gb nano, which RB did not work anymore for, probably will have unsuscribed from the list after reading this: >As has been pointed out *many* times, the change isn't going to be reverted, >and until someone with a problem Nano either fixes it or lends it to a dev to >work on, it isn't likely to get fixed. >Especially considering the fact that some people have reported still >experiencing the problem even with the mhz rolled back to 78 (or even 75 if >some of the reports are accurate) meaning you're still in the same situation: >"The problem is here, and it affects some people but not all." >Yes, that is very weird if Rockbox used to work for those people. Non >consistent behaviour is very unfortunate! >Please continue discussion here: >http://forums.rockbox.org...index.php?topic=11504.135 where BTW there is no solution pointed: >People that want a workaround for this will have to do it themselves. ... >From what I can see, the clock was upped to 80MHz for no real solid reason >other than "technically and theoretically it can be done". People then >reported that is caused problems and the change was not reverted. This is the >first time I've seen this happen on Rockbox. >I am also going to close this thread - as the signal is getting lost amongst >the noise. The same questions keep getting asked again and again, probably >because of the eleven pages of thread. (nov '07) r13990 is the last that worked for me. Anyway, I'll give current build a new try. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) http://www.paconet.org
