Hi Al, > Why did you completely ignore my concerns about how it works now and the > suggested solution? Not even listed as a possible option.
Assuming you mean the "variable skip length"/"max skip length" ides, I really don't like it - not an option for me . (I get annoyed enough when the current seek slows down towards track end - I'd scrap that too were I a dictator!) I also don't see any reason why PREV and NEXT should be "symmetric" , it's all about how these (UI) features are used, not how the logic works. This is, of course, just my opinion. >> (The third option in you list, mentioned in the followup, was to remove >> the setting as a whole.) The third option was not to remove the setting, but to change it from "Prevent track skipping" to "Prevent skipping". Hope that's clearer now - I shouldn't attempt to interleave paid work (TM) with Rockbox fun... pondlife
