2009/11/3 Thomas Martitz <thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de>: > On 03.11.2009 19:15, Jonathan Gordon wrote: >> >> What is the actual harm in having both? it can obviously be argued >> either way makes the skin more readable, and there is absolutly no >> negative impact on adding the extra token (when we run out of 2 letter >> combos we will be up the creek anyway), and that *entire* commit added >> under 1000bytes on the worst target (and I highly doubt it was because >> of the one setting which gets a duplicate tag) >> > > This is what I meant with that you change your coding style every other day. > (Some of) The new tags are completely redundant. A few days ago you > discussed hard to kill the "redundant" (it really isn't) %Vi tag. >
There is a big difference here... Removing redundancy in code is good.. removing user options is bad. And I ended up agreeing that %Vi was needed.. (and will be more needed once I get more into the recording skinning stuff!)
