> I'll put it back at my h340 and we'll see... Cool - be careful!
> Your theory about the bootloader getting too big sounds feasible. It was LinusN's theory, but the increase past the 0x400 byte mark adds weight to it. > So we've to have a look at the modules which form the bootloader and what > changed in last time. More likely we need to see if we can fix the problem that limits the size, if it is indeed the problem. > But how are we able to test your theory? > Even if we lower the bootloader size - who'll brave enough to test it and > risk another brick? Not me ;-) I think this will have to be somebody who has both an H300 and a BDM debugger. I don't know if this includes anyone except Linus - but if it does, now would be a good time for them to speak up. pondlife
