On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:27:50 +0200
Edgar Toernig <fro...@gmx.de> wrote:

> Rafaël Carré wrote:
> > The Clip+ has the same amount than Clipv2 (8MB + 1MB IRAM)
> > 
> > Clipv1 has 2MB + 320kB IRAM
> 
> Is it possible that the skin buffer, which is in the BSS, is placed in
> the IRAM and doesn't affect the track buffer?

Only if it is explicitely declared it with IBSS_ATTR

-- 
✍ Rafaël Carré ☺

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to