On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 01:23:12PM -0700, Andrew Poelstra wrote: > > I second this. We have a few other timing issues with certain targets > (ie, USB) that would be greatly helped by using the PLL - and would > also let us remove some of the idle loops (which are a huge PITA to > maintain across different compilers and optimization flags) with proper > timers. > > Andrew >
Brainfart! I was thinking of using the PIT perhiphial, when available, which is a different discussion. However, I do agree with the use of the PLL. Correct playback should be a higher priority than battery life - and it looks like even that is not really an issue. Andrew
