On 2 November 2010 08:24, Thomas Martitz <thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de> wrote: > Am 01.11.2010 22:14, schrieb Jonathan Gordon: >> >> From your opening post on the topic.. "I'd propose to make the change >> for all and force people to adapt the missing parts finally (the >> absolute point mode is not a new thing at all)? " >> Reverting android also gives you more motivation to fix it instead of >> being lazy and passing the responsibility onto others (and yes it is >> your responsibility, you broke the UI you need to fix it. >> > > There is nothing to fix for RaaA IMO. So what should be fixed? I don't need > motivation to fix nothing. > > "you broke the UI" is a lot exaggerated. I'd even argue that I fixed it (as > in a lot better than before). Please also remember that we talk about the > default value of an ordinary setting. Reverting for the individual is as > simple as browsing the setting so nothing is "broken". > > Best regards. >
RaaA is not the only touchscreen target, you could have fixed it for all of them with a tiny amount of effort, yet you chose to be selfish and ignore them. consequently you broke the onda by allowing it to get into a state where it is impossible to recover from without resetting when there is no good reason. Defaults are there for safety, anyone can change their setting locally which is exactly why grid was default for all this time. You broke onda and by your own admission it isn't likely for anyone else to fix it so you have caused a pretty high rated regression to appear.
