On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 09:22:07PM +0200, Al Le wrote: > >The initial focus will be on getting the library working, not on a nice > >API. In order to appeal to software other than Rockbox... > > IMO the API should be laid out first. How else can you say that the > library "works"? Besides: a nice API would be a very appealing thing > for other projects (other than Rockbox).
The library "works" if it can be used to test codecs on Linux. The API will be *usable* initially, but not necessarily flexible enough for other projects. Making it flexible could require significant changes to the codecs, and I want to delay that until after the test suite is working.
