On 05/31/2011 05:25 AM, Thomas Martitz wrote:
Am 31.05.2011 11:28, schrieb Frank Gevaerts:
This selection of questions is actually very symptomatic of why I do
*not* want to switch to git. Git users seem to be very unwilling to
accept the mere existence of other similar tools as a rule, and that's
not something I wish to be associated with.
Well, we discuss git because that's what most of DCVS-people are used
to. Why should we discuss a DCVS nobody knows if there's one that many
people know and appreciate?
Mercurial is also well known. Google project hosting offers the choice
of Subversion or Mercurial, for example.
I have no issue with any of the well known DVCS's, but what's does
Rockbox gain by switching?
Subversion seems to be working just fine right now, and a change would
take a lot of work by somebody.
Regards,
John.
