On 2011-06-20 22:12, mai...@svn.rockbox.org wrote:
Optimize new dircache_copy_path so that the helper (strlcat) doesn't need to walk through the entire string repeatedly.
Is it really a performance problem? Avoiding this kind of pointer/buffer size juggling is one of the reasons for using strlcpy/strlcat.
Also fix a off-by-one.
Not really, as strlcpy/strlcat takes the full size of the buffer as argument. Unless it is needed because of the offset juggling? :)
-- Magnus
