As an iFP799 owner, let it rest. :) On Aug 4, 2014 3:27 PM, "Michael Sevakis" <jethea...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> The reason I dig this up from the dead is to suggest including IFP7xx in > the purge. It's very incomplete with special exclusions in various places > emphasizing its lack of finish. I doubt anyone's gonna do anything with it. > I know I'm not and I don't want to maintain it when I update certain > things. >
