Didier: Yes, I think we should. Unfortunately, we have made significant modifications in the library to accommodate our kernel modules with other compression protocols. I think we are going to look at your fixes and incorporate them, instead of upgrading the entire library. On another note, your fix to allow multiple options list structs, with rasing the wlsb_width parameter significantly reduce our errors. By the way, how high can wlsb_width be set to, and what is the tradeoff with a high wlsb_width value?
Thanks and kind regards, TW -----Original Message----- From: Rohc [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Didier Barvaux Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 2:45 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Rohc] ROHC TCP dynamic field changes > We are using revision 996. Please consider updating to latest revision (1091 at the time of writing) because I fixed more than 30 problems with the TCP profile since revision 996. Regards, Didier _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~rohc Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~rohc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
