We have also around 1800 blogs and it's growing rapidly. Also, around 12K people make use of the system in total and this we know because we don't allow anonymous comments. You need to be authenticated for someone to comment/post.
I wonder why you are not allowed to give out server info. Maybe I'll hold off on that too for now. I'm sure others have asked this before, but is there a plan of turning Roller blogs into static HTML? I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts on this. I'm sure this would alleviate many of the caching performance problems. Elias On 8/9/05, Allen Gilliland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am diverging from the deployments discussion for a second because Elias > comment sparked a question. I'm interested in anything that anyone wants to > share about their roller installation ... > > how many blogs does it have? > what is your performance like? > what are your cache size settings? > how good is your caching efficiency on average? > any numbers on how much activity the site gets? hits/visits? load? > server info? processors? ram? OS? webserver? database? > how is stability? does the server require restarts often? > > anything that can be shared would be cool. i'd like to keep some info on who > is running roller and in what kind of environments so that we can hopefully > make sure we are keeping roller well suited for various situations. > > blogs.sun.com currently has almost 1600 blogs on it and our stability is > quite good. i would give out server info, but i'm not allowed to. probably > our biggest performance concern is page caching, which has gotten worse and > worse as more people start blogging. i think out cache size is 4000 right > now and that is plenty for the rss cache, but the page cache is still > overwhelmed :/ > > anyways ... how about others? > > -- Allen > > > On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 13:59, Elias Torres wrote: > > I'm also not an official part of the project, but I might be running > > the second or third largest Roller-based website ;-) and my opinion if > > it counts at all, is that if Dave/Allen can handle the heat in the > > kitchen, let them stay in the kitchen. I'm sure that's why they pay > > them the big bucks. > >
