I agree with Allen. I think the shorter the urls the better. Weblog is completely redundant. If I had my say, I'd change page too. :-)
Elias On 8/17/05, Allen Gilliland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 13:53, Matt Raible wrote: > > You need the page names for when you add *other* pages to your blog. > > Most people don't use this feature, but I do: > > > > http://raibledesigns.com/page/rd/archives > > http://raibledesigns.com/page/rd/contact > > http://raibledesigns.com/page/rd/about > > > > right. i do this too ;) > > but my main point was that the templates that i want to standardize (Weblog, > _day, _decorator, _css) really do *not* need to be accessed by name like > that, so it would be fine to keep them from being renamed. > > i agree that if you create an "About" page that you should be able to set the > name/link of that page to whatever you want. > > -- Allen > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > -- Allen > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 11:29, Matt Raible wrote: > > > > I like having the ability to rename as /page/username/home seems more > > > > appropriate to me than /page/username/Weblog. > > > > > > > > My $0.02, > > > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > On 8/17/05, Lance Lavandowska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I'm surprised Dave has chimed in on the "not renamable" part, as he > > > > > renamed his Weblog page (I haven't looked to see if he changed it > > > > > back). > > > > > > > > > > Lance > > > > > > > > > > On 8/17/05, Allen Gilliland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > So, Lance had some good thoughts about how the decorator works, but > > > > > > nobody else has chimed in on the idea of standardizing the 4 main > > > > > > templates. > > > > > > > > > > > > Basically they would work the same way they do today, except that > > > > > > they would be (1) required and (2) not renamable. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Allen > > > > > > > > > > > > >
