Is the plan to make the numeric achor optional? It is definitely great for corporate blogs inside corporate firewalls.
But on internet facing blogs, the text achors are helpful for clarity and improve PageRank in Google. -John ----- Original Message ----- From: Allen Gilliland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 11:45 am Subject: Re: Corporate Blogging Features > On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 13:12, Dave Johnson wrote: > > Some users have asked for numeric anchors (different from the DB > id), > > which I think is a good idea. So, post number one would have > anchor 1, > > two would have 2, and so on. > > > > So we'd have: > > > > myserver.com/roller/page/foo?entry=434 > > > > instead of: > > > > myserver.com/roller/page/foo?entry=i_hate_microsoft > > i like that idea ... sounds like a nice and simple rfe. > > -- Allen > > > > > > - Dave > > > > > > > > > > what else would need to be changed? > > > > > > -- Allen > > > > > >> > > >>>> i think there are actually 2 action items here. (1) provide > a good > > >>>> SSO > > >>>> structure so that a roller admin could easily define what > happens > > >>>> when a > > >>>> user transfers from another application into roller and (2) > provide > > >>>> a > > >>>> good way for roller to be remotely administrated, possibly > via > > >>>> secure > > >>>> web services. by remotely administrated i mean ... register > users,> >>>> create weblogs, reset account info, etc. we do this > stuff at Sun > > >>>> right > > >>>> now, but we've just hacked a backdoor for roller and really > this > > >>>> should > > >>>> be flushed out into a full feature. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> ahhh... a nice remote interface would be awesome. so much to > do, so > > >>> little time. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> I've been giving some thought to a Admin API that is based > roughly on > > >> the same fundamental design concepts as the Atom Publishing > API. It > > >> would be great if we could come up with a mechanism that could be > > >> implemented across multiple blogging platforms. > > >> > > >> - James > > > > > > >
