okay ... i've tested this and it works on mysql 4.1.x, but not on mysql 4.0.x.  
i don't think we should drop support for mysql 4.0.x, especially because we use 
a 4.0.x db for one of our roller installs here at Sun.

Elias,

what exactly is broken about it?  does Derby/DB2/others not have a column type 
of DATETIME?  or does the conversion now work from TIMESTAMP to DATETIME?

-- Allen


On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 13:57, Elias Torres wrote:
> On 10/17/05, Allen Gilliland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 13:00, Elias Torres wrote:
> > > I have checked this with DB2 and it works fine:
> > >
> > > [[[
> > > CREATE TABLE t1 (  ts1 TIMESTAMP DEFAULT NULL );
> > > ]]]
> >
> > Does this work as expected with Mysql 4.0.x though?
> >
> > what about this paragraph from the link you gave ...
> >
> > "If a DEFAULT value is specified for the first TIMESTAMP column in a table, 
> > it is not ignored. The default can be CURRENT_TIMESTAMP or a constant date 
> > and time value.
> >
> 
> We could make pubtime be the second column. :-)
> 
> > DEFAULT NULL is the same as DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP for the first 
> > TIMESTAMP column. For any other TIMESTAMP column, DEFAULT NULL is treated 
> > as DEFAULT 0."
> >
> > I suppose we need to test this a bit.
> 
> Let's please do that, because I don't think that there should be many
> requirements that would make us drop support for any of the databases
> we currently support.
> 
> >
> > -- Allen
> >
> >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Elias
> > >
> > > [1] http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/4.1/en/timestamp-4-1.html
> > > [2] http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/timestamp-4-1.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 10/17/05, Allen Gilliland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 17:12, Elias Torres wrote:
> > > > > I just noticed that change in the schema (date field in weblogentry)
> > > > > too and it breaks DB2 since the field type is not supported. I checked
> > > > > documentation and datetime is also not supported on Derby either.
> > > > > Anyways, I don't know the differences between datetime and timestamp.
> > > > > Why does pubtime need to be a datetime as opposed to a timestamp? Is
> > > > > this something that can be done via a customizable datatype as in
> > > > > TEXT? Just a thought.
> > > >
> > > > I put in the change from Timestamp to Datetime because in Mysql if you 
> > > > insert a NULL value into a Timestamp column then Mysql will 
> > > > automatically set it to the current date/time.  The modification I made 
> > > > to the way pubtime works requires that we be able to save draft entries 
> > > > with a NULL pubtime.
> > > >
> > > > In Mysql the Timestamp and Datetime are the exact same thing except 
> > > > that a Datetime will never be set automatically.
> > > >
> > > > -- Allen
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Elias
> > > > >
> > > > > On 10/16/05, Dave Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Here's my theory. We changed the weblog entry pubtime into a date 
> > > > > > field
> > > > > > rather than a timestamp and I bet we didn't test against PostgreSQL 
> > > > > > (I
> > > > > > know I didn't).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > According to the docs below, we need to do the temp table trick if 
> > > > > > we
> > > > > > want to change a column type in PostgreSQL:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >     http://techdocs.postgresql.org/techdocs/updatingcolumns.php
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Then, we may have data type issues. I hope PostgreSQL has a 
> > > > > > compatible
> > > > > > DATETIME field.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm out of the office for the next couple of days, so I won't have a
> > > > > > chance to look into this.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - Dave
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Oct 16, 2005, at 12:19 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 10/12/05, Dave Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > >> Is this complete? Can we close the JIRA issues for DB2 and Derby
> > > > > > >> support and if not, what remains to be done?
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> And BTW, the 2.0 bug list is getting pretty slim.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Heh, there I was thinking it had a long time to go; which 
> > > > > > > explained
> > > > > > > the problems I was seeing where posting an entry to a new blog
> > > > > > > buggered it up big time.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://opensource2.atlassian.com/projects/roller/browse/ROL-844
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >

Reply via email to