+1, both to Allen's email and Matt's 120 chars.
On 11/3/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm +1 for following the standard conventions. However, I'd like to > propose we use 120 characters per line instead of 80. > > http://java.sun.com/docs/codeconv/html/CodeConventions.doc3.html#313 > > Matt > > On 11/3/05, Allen Gilliland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i hate to bring this up yet again, but i want to make sure this is truly > > finalized. i think most of us are in favor of K&R style code supported by > > the standard java coding conventions, so let's put it to a final vote. > > > > does everyone agree that we will move forward supporting the standard for > > Java programming code conventions detailed here? > > > > http://java.sun.com/docs/codeconv/html/CodeConvTOC.doc.html > > > > assuming we are all in agreement, then can we also agree that all new files > > will be introduced using the new conventions. when you go to modify an > > exisiting file you should first reformat the entire file and update it to > > the new code conventions, then commit that version back to svn with a > > comment like "updating file to new code conventions". then go ahead and > > make your edits. > > > > i am +1 on the Java programming code conventions. > > > > -- Allen > > > > >
