I like to use the Edit links (well, I did while my blog was running). 
Perhaps the answer is to just *not cache* the user's own page when she
is logged in?

Lance

On 11/4/05, Allen Gilliland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> guys,
>
> I wanted to present this idea and see what everyone's opinions are.  I am 
> working to design some improvements in our caching system and one of my 
> current hangups is the fact that we render weblog pages differently when a 
> user is logged in.  Why does that matter?
>
> Well, if a weblog has 100 entries then we know for sure that there are at 
> least 101 unique pages for that weblog.  100 permalinks + 1 main page.  Since 
> currently we render the page differently if the weblog owner is logged in, 
> then that means we now know there are at least 202 unique pages for that 
> weblog.  Ok, so what?  Well, if you are a large site like jRoller or 
> blogs.sun.com with say 2000 bloggers then the difference is now between 
> 202,000 pages and 404,000 pages.
>
> The difference between caching 202,000 pages and 404,000 pages is quite a lot.
>
> Now, if there was a very good reason to maintain those extra 202,000 pages 
> then I would be all for it, but my feeling is that there is only a marginally 
> good reason for doing this.  The *only* person who benefits from the pages 
> with "edit" links is the weblog owner.  That means we would be caching 101 
> extra pages per weblog (double the normal amount), just to benefit a single 
> person.  This seems silly when the user could just as easily login to the 
> editing interface and accomplish the same things.
>
> Personally, I don't login and go to my own weblog page to use those "edit" 
> links, so I would prefer to ditch them and know that my cache now has twice 
> as much room as it did before.
>
> We could try doing something fancy like caching only parts of pages, but that 
> is currently made difficult by the fact that weblogs are fully rendered by 
> velocity templates and so we don't have much opportunity to implant caching 
> hooks where we really want to.
>
> I haven't worked with too many other blogging apps, but my guess is that very 
> few of them have that same feature which offers "edit" links right on your 
> weblog.  e.g., any site the does static page generation would be out.
>
> It's possible that we could make this a configurable feature which would be 
> on by default.  That way large sites could disable it if they want, but we 
> wouldn't be taking it away from everyone.
>
> Anyways, I wanted to try and feel out how many people really like/use those 
> "edit" links which show up on their weblog when they are logged in.  I have 
> never used them so I wouldn't care much if they were gone.
>
> -- Allen
>
>
>

Reply via email to