OK. I've gone ahead and checked in the upgrade to 1.2.11
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=332342&view=rev
Allen Gilliland wrote:
+1 from me.
-- allen
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 09:28, Matt Raible wrote:
I'm fine with 1.2.11, that's what I'm currently using.
On 11/10/05, Anil Gangolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK. 1.2.11 anyone?
--a.
Matt Raible wrote:
http://www.cheblogs.com/roller/page/damien?anchor=jboss_and_log4j_1_2
On 11/10/05, Anil Gangolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've just built and done some testing of Roller 2.0 in my own workspace
with log4j 1.2.12. All I had to do was drop in the jar and change the
properties.xmlf to point to it. The existing default Roller
log4j.propertiers configuration seemed to work without any issue.
Is it ok to check this in, or is it too risky for 2.0 at this point?
Matt, can you remember the specific problems you had with configuration
compatibility?
--a.
Matt Raible wrote:
I recently tried to upgrade to 1.2.12 and found that there were some
incompatibilities with my config file. I forget what they were - but
it basically wasn't a simple upgrade. For that reason, I'm currently
using 1.2.11.
Matt
On 11/6/05, Anil Gangolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Log4j is up to 1.2.12. We're still using/distributing 1.2.4 in the
trunk (bound for 2.0). I think we should upgrade to 1.2.12 in the trunk.
May want to look at some of our other dependencies as well before 2.0
goes out.
--a.
