Let's rephrase the question: For the high-traffic Roller sites, are you using your container to GZip output, or are you using Roller's built-in GZip filters?
I'm using the built-in filters, not any that are provided by Apache or Tomcat. Therefore, I'm -1 on this change. Matt On 11/10/05, Allen Gilliland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > would anyone be opposed to disabling the Roller gzip filters for default > installs? > > to make it easier to toggle on/off i am thinking we can add a config property > like "compressOutput.enabled" and make some small modifications to the > CompressionFilter to check that property before compressing output. that > seems better than forcing people to modify the web.xml file. > > this seems appropriate because most containers these days offer their own > compression capabilities which means it's one more thing that we don't have > to manage ourselves. obviously we can leave what we have in place for those > users who still want it, but just have it disabled by default. > > this would be for Roller 2.1 > > -- Allen > >
