OK, I'll change my vote to +0.
On 11/11/05, Allen Gilliland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dave has been running 2.0 versions on his site for over a month, and we have > had 2.0 running on blogs.sun.com for the past couple weeks. > > +1 from me. > > -- Allen > > > On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 12:28, Matt Raible wrote: > > Is this going to be an "release candidate" or a final release? I'm +1 > > for a release candidate, but -1 on a final release. I think it's best > > to let the community try out an RC when we're doing a big version > > jump. > > > > Matt > > > > On 11/11/05, Dave Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > And we're almost ready to release Roller 2.0-incubating on Java.Net too. > > > Below is a summary of release status. > > > > > > > > > *** Release vote started November 7, 2004 -- incomplete > > > > > > So far we have: > > > Dave +1 > > > Henri +1 > > > > > > > > > *** Release candidate is ready for final testing > > > > > > I have built the first Roller 2.0 release candidate based on Subversion > > > rev 332637 and made the files available in my personal space ~snoopdave > > > on people.apache.org (not publicly available): > > > > > > The files are: > > > roller-2.0-rc1-incubating.tar.gz > > > roller-src-2.0-rc1-incubating.tar.gz > > > roller-tools-2.0-rc1-incubating.tar.gz > > > > > > The release contains the same dependencies and 3rd party components > > > as the Roller 1.3 release, and the same un-endorsed incubating release > > > warnings. > > > > > > Now is the time to test the release, raise any final issues and wrap up > > > the vote. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > - Dave > > > > > > > >
