On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 21:21, David M Johnson wrote: > > Anyhow... back to the original issue I brought up: > > We have up-to-date versions of the user guide and installation guides > for > Roller 2.1-incubating in ODF format now. We already decided to use ODF > for the user guide. > > Should we have a vote on whether or not to use the ODF install guide > in the 2.1 release? If not, I'll put it back on the wiki.
I am fine with having the ODF document in the release, but I think we have to export it to plain text as well. I am fine with asking people to have OO to edit the document, but not just to read it. Roller users should get a plain text install/upgrade/user guide included in each release. -- Allen > > I argue that: > > Using ODF in 2.1 does not preclude changing to a different source > format > in the future (thanks to well-known, standard XML format and the OO > Java API). > > And I think they are an improvement over the JSPWiki versions, so I > propose we: > * Ship the ODF and PDF files in the release > * Make ODF, PDF and HTML versions available on the web > * Put the release notes on the wiki, so we can easily update them > > > - Dave >
