Actually, I had already asked about that and I believe everyone was in agreement. I just hadn't commited it yet is all.
-- Allen On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 16:28, George Daswani wrote: > If Roller is going Servlet 2.4 - then it would be wise to upgrade > taglibs also from 1.0.3 -> 1.1.2 > > George Daswani > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 11:33 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Roller 2.1 / Jetty 5.1.10 / Postgres 8.1.2? > > I just tried building for 2.4 and it looks like XDoclet did the right > thing. I'll commit the 1 character change to build.xml once I verify > that. > > ROL-873: Supplied web.xml is not Servlet 2.4 compliant > Is now set to fix-for Roller 2.2 > > - Dave > > > On Mar 7, 2006, at 3:40 AM, Anil Gangolli wrote: > > > Yipes. Did we release another version without switching the > > web.xml and its declared type formally to the Servlet 2.4 DTD? I > > thought we all agreed to this back in December, but I guess it > > didn't actually happen and nobody caught it. Were issues encountered? > > --a. > > > > > > Corbett J. Klempay wrote: > >> Hello all -- > >> > >> I'm a first time Roller user. I just downloaded 2.1 and thought > >> I'd have a go at mating it with my existing Jetty 5.1.10 and > >> Postgres 8.1.2 installations. Is anyone else already running this > >> (or a very similar) combination? I'd appreciate any guidance (as > >> the Jetty-specific install document seems pretty stale at this > >> point). > >> > >> I did see the earlier thread started by Amy about Jetty being > >> unhappy with the presence of dispatch elements in web.xml; I have > >> commented those out already. I'm not really all that > >> knowledgeable with Jetty, either -- up to now, it's just been > >> hosting a big JAlbum site. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> - Corbett > >> > >> > >
