On May 3, 2006, at 4:49 PM, John Hoffmann wrote:
Yes, you hit on a pet peeve. Extensions for content type not
implementation.
When designing the JavaOne web site 5 years ago we made every page
available in 4 formats which was controlled by the extension.
standard ones:
javaone/2001/session-1234/detail.html (for desktop browser visitors)
javaone/2001/session-1234/detail.xml (for crawling by 3rd party
data harvesters)
two custom types:
javaone/2001/session-1234/detail.lite (for small screen devices)
javaone/2001/session-1234/detail.prt (for printing)
John, are you saying that you are for or against file extensions?
- Dave
