On May 3, 2006, at 6:21 PM, Allen Gilliland wrote:
In any case, I think those of us following this discussion have
enough info to make an informed decision, so I suggest we try and
pick a route and move on.
My vote is still for NOT using file extensions.
Based on what we know, I vote that we continue to NOT use extensions.
- Static site generation is possible without them
- I don't think we have ample evidence that their absence hurts
search rankings
- We've been happy without them for years
- Dave
