Allen Gilliland wrote:
> i believe that Spring appears to be the more ideal solution for the
> Content Delivery component because it is a bit less intrusive, very
> lightweight, would require minimal code modifications to integrate, and
> it's whole claim to fame is basically it's model and view independence.
But isn't Don saying that SAF2 also has these same characteristics, and
more, but since everyone focuses on how SAF2 enables complex applications,
the fact that it also simple applications simply isn't well understood?
That's what I was getting from Don: that there isn't anything that SpringMVC
makes simple that SAF2 doesn't also make simple, and that he is volunteering
to help do the work.
--- Noel
