On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 05:27:00PM -0600, Tom Whiting wrote: > ... replace CHAR_DATA spouse; with CHAR_DATA *spouse so you can actually > do "if (ch->pcdata->spouse!=NULL)" as a real test :-) > -- Was done before the email was sent out, that was my bad there..
indeed. > ... check that you proper initialize spouse in new_pc_data() ... > -- new_pc_data()??? According to grep and other tools, new_pc_data just > don't exist here. new_pcdata then. Be a little creative with what I tell you :-) > (damned,this start to sound like somebody who never did any C > programming). ... > -- Actually, this was put in from a snip, something I probably never > should have done, but it worked for what it was supposed to be at the > time.. > compile your stuff with -Wall, because I think your assignments should > > If %s IS the variable that I should be using, then why the compile > errors? %s is for "char *" types, you are supplying "CHAR_DATA *" types. If you want a "temperary" pointer to the char-data, which will only be used in this function for once and not for ever more, then just let it point to the CHAR_DATA of the spouse and do the act with that. Anyway, you have enough pointers now to fix your problem. Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.MavEtJu.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Interested in MUDs? Visit Fatal Dimensions: ------------------+ http://www.FatalDimensions.org/
