Yes, you are bound by the ROM license.
if you took ROM, changed every function, every variable name, and basically
re-wrote it from scratch, you still started from ROM.  You're bound by that
license.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 4:12 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: programmable strings
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Sandi, Palrich, et al.
> 
> A couple of years ago, in my ambition to help the ROM 
> community, I came up with the idea of "programmable strings". 
> The concept was to have strings that could be programmed.
> 
> That is something like ... sometimes the string would say... 
> "Its a beautiful day outside" or "Its very dark because a 
> storm is brewing overhead"...
> 
> I know how to do this. I can say this with some finality now. 
> In fact, I'm reasonably positive that I could complete it in 
> some short time. But I'm not interested.
> 
> At first, I worked on that project very diligently for a 
> couple of months, but Yahoo! discontinued free POP access... 
> and therefore I lost my connection to the rom list. (Believe 
> me, I'm not about to check 200+ emails a day on a web based system!)
> 
> So my interest wanned. Indeed, it hasn't been revived. I will 
> be implementing something like it in my mud... but I wouldn't 
> do it in ROM. Not that Rom's a bad code base at all! (Since I 
> am writing my own.)
> 
> I've grown alot as a programmer since that time. And, 
> hopefully, as a person as well. :-)  So this is my offer:
> 
> If someone is interested in how to add programmable strings 
> to their mud, drop me a line. I do know how, and I assure 
> you, it wouldn't be as hard as people imagine. ;-) (Indeed, 
> after building a full fledged compiler for my compiler 
> class... building a pidly programmable script string is pathetic. ;-))
> 
> I just have one question. In places, I have looked up how to 
> do various things in various code bases... and in fact, I 
> have rewritten entire functions in ROM. (Specifically, 
> write_to_descriptor). My question is... am I bound by the ROM 
> license if I include the functions that I rewrote for ROM in 
> my mud? (Even though I completely rewrote them, they still 
> contain basic logic, and in some cases, variable names.)
> 
> But I mean please... there's only so many ways to transmit 
> data to someone.. (for instance!)
> 
> Mark Roberts
> Esheliam
> 
> 
> -- 
> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> Version: 3.12
> GCS d s: a-- C++>$ UL+ P+ L++ !E(---) W- N o? K? w 
> O- M-- V-- PS+ PE-- Y+ !PGP !tv t+ 5? X? R* b+++ DI+ D- 
> G++ e++> h---- r+++ y--
> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ROM mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.rom.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rom
> 

Reply via email to