There isn't another reply.
[(D)isplay again, Go (B)ack, (R)eply, (X)it viewing]
[De(L)ete Post/Replies, Dele(T)e Entire Thread, (E)dit post, (M)ove]
>thread 1
Thread being deleted. Exiting from from view mode.
Entire thread deleted.
Ya.. thanks! You shoulldn't have had the moderator features *L* stupid
function only returning true *grin* Fixed now!
Complaints:
-- I got lost easily. I got lost in the 3-post 'Bored' thread, because I
didn't know where I was when I was viewing replies. Maybe make it, when
you
are viewing replies, have the original posts and/or previous replies above
the
one I am viewing and the next ones below. I.e.:
Ya. I'm trying to figure it out. I'm thinking about showing an entire
thread, but, well... I think that'd get far to spammy. Maybe I could just
show to a certian depth.
Suggested enhancements:
-- Color-differentiate visited threads (board-level)--maybe bright white
for
new/unread, gray for already-read (not an easy task)
I think I get this. You mean when displaying the thread view some
differently? Expand alittle. But I think I got it, and nah, not hard at all.
I already got read/unread threads in there via id numbers.
-- When exiting a thread, display all the available threads in the forum,
saves
me from having to type 'thread view'.
I don't get this one either...
-- When I do:
--> thread 1
Your current thread is set to: Bored.
<<do an automatic 'thread view' for me here>>
Great idea. Done and done.
-- When viewing threads in a board, I should just be able to type in '1' or
'2'
to switch threads. Much easier.
Another great idea! Done and done.
-- Also, when in 'thread' mode, I hate having to type in 'thread
<whatever>'.
Pure laziness on my behalf, but it's 7 more letters than I want to type.
Ever
thought about creating a 'menu' type system for commands?
i.e.
*****************************************************************************
struct pc_data
{
...
DO_FUN *in_cmd; /*What function/command are we in*/
...
}
Then, somewhere in interpret(), add:
ch->pcdata->in_cmd = cmd_table[cmd].do_fun;
Or, better, in functions that will be 'interactive', set it yourself:
void do_buy(CHAR_DATA *ch, char *argument)
{
ch->pcdata->in_cmd = do_buy;
...
}
Don't forget, though, each interactive function will need some way to exit
for
'normal' interp.
In interpret(), somewhere above the above, there'd be a check, something
like:
if (ch->pcdata->in_cmd)
{
(*ch->pcdata->in_cmd) (ch, argument);
return;
}
Or, better:
if (ch->pcdata->in_cmd)
{
do_function(ch, ch->pcdata->in_cmd, argument);
return;
}
Excellent idea. I'll whip something up later.
Davion
_________________________________________________________________
Free yourself from those irritating pop-up ads with MSn Premium. Get 2months
FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines
