I don't think it has anything to do with the objnest... just remove all the stuff dealing with 'old format'. Basicly, if an object is deleted, and the vnum still lingers in a pfile, its gunna consider it old school format. I don't see why you ever need to put that in anymore. Old school is as outdated as fpReserve :). I say, remove it. If the get_obj_index is null, then the object does not exist, and don't even bother loading.
Davion On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 19:56:28 -0500 (EST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > but once this create_object line executes for the first > > content object, right after that, doing a "print rgObjNest[0]->name" > > results in the name of the object that was just created > > That should only happen if the Nest was set to 0, as shown by this line: > rgObjNest[iNest] = obj; > > So if the inner object is properly set with a Nest of 1, it will show up > in rgObjNest[1]. If it doesn't have a Nest of 1, it's not inside of the > container. > > Just out of curiosity, is this the same pfile that keeps doing it? Does it > happen on a specific object entry? If so, post the relevant object. > > This sounds to me like it might be a problem in the pfile. > > > > -- > ROM mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.rom.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rom >
