--- Tom Whiting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Keep in mind as well that *BSD is -=NOT=- linux and you may have to make some > pretty drastic changes to get 'er up and running under a BSD box. There are a > number of reasons for this from the way BSD handles memory to the way it > handles connections. If you're not sure what you're doing, or don't have the > time to play with it, I'd suggest going with a redhat (or fedora now) box.
Eh.. They are both POSIX compiant afaik, and the BSD socket api is also pretty much the same. I don't see that it would be all that different. As for memory.. well malloc has the same interface (args & return value). Why is it so much harder? ===== -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version 3.1 GCS/L/C/O d-(+) s++: a-- C+++$>++++ UBLS++++$ P+++(--)$ L+++>++++ E--- W+>++$ N !o K? w(--) !O M- !V PS+ PE(++) Y+ PGP->+ t+ 5 X+() R(+) tv+@ b++(+++) !DI+++ D G(-) e>+++$ h---() r+++ y+++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
