Carta de la Washington reprezinta o completare a Cartei de la Venetia din 1964.
   
  Practic, Carta de la Washington, care este rezultatul unui studiu realizat pe 
parcursul a 12 ani, este nivelul superior, este o completare foarte necesara a 
Cartei de la Venetia.
   
  Cladirile istorice nu se pot pastra cum trebuie daca zona respectiva este 
afectata. Daca o cladire istorica este inconjurata de blocuri, cum a facut 
Ceausescu cu niste biserici ascunse in spatele blocurilor pe bulevardul Unirii, 
si cum vrea acum sa faca Videanu pe Calea Victoriei, respectiva cladire isi 
pierde enorm din valoare. Desemnarea zonei ca istorica pune in valoare 
cladirile. Carta de la Venetia definea metodologiile de pastrare si restaurare 
a unei cladiri istorice. Marea lacuna era lipsa prezervarii ca zona, ca arie, 
la nivel de cartier istoric, si acest lucru a fost completat cu Carta de la 
Washington.
   
  Practic Carta de la Washington are precedenta, este prima care trebuie 
aplicata - asadar este imperios necesara definirea zonei istorice, a 
cartierului istoric. Pana nu se face acest lucru, Carta de la Washington face 
referire la vechea Carta de la Venetia:
   
  6. Until a conservation plan has been adopted, any necessary conservation 
activity should be carried out in accordance with the principles and the aims 
of this Charter and the Venice Charter.
   
   
  Necesitatea acestei carte de la Washington, ca o completare a cartei  de la 
Venetia este subliniata in paragraful:
   
  ICOMOS deems necessary to draw up an international charter for historic towns 
and urban areas that will complement "The Venice Charter." 

  Faptul ca Romania are o legislatie in domeniu extraordinar de slaba si ca 
legea 140/2002 desemneaza o zona istorica foarte mica, nici macar un sfert din 
zona istorica care s-a pastrat cu greu din comunism, este o mare boala 
romaneasca, pentru ca in Romania se incearca de multe ori sa se copieze din 
Vest, dar sa se faca prost copierea, si sa se faca neaplicabila, si sa distruga 
insasi ideea initiala.
   
  O zicala spune: "mai bine mai putin si bine, decat mult si prost".
  In Romania s-a copiat mult din Vest in legislatie in ultimii ani, teoretic 
avem legi dar practic sunt neaplicabile.
   
  Legea din 2002 pentru desemnarea "centrului istoric" este o lege 
neaplicabila, nu se spune care sunt conditiile pentru a construi cladiri noi in 
zona, inaltimi maxime, fatade sau care sunt conditiile pentru a reface fatadele 
cladirilor din zona, nu spune care ar putea fi pedepsele pentru cei care 
demoleaza cladiri din zona sau fac ilegalitati. Dar cea mai mare hiba este 
insasi desemnarea zonei Lipscani-Blanari ca zona istorica, lasand in afara 
zonei, chiar la granita, Univesitatea  Bucuresti, Universitatea de Arhitectura 
Ion Mincu, Palatul Cec, Cercul Militar National, lasand in afara zonei istorice 
Palatul Regal, Ateneul Roman, Piata Revolutiei, Piata Romana, bulevardul 
Kogalniceanu, Ansamblul Patriarhiei din Dealul Mitropoliei, etc etc....
   
  Avand in vedere toate recentele distrugeri, demolari de pe Calea Victoriei si 
agresiuni asupra zonei istorice prin constructii de blocuri turn, este nevoie  
urgenta pentru o lege a cartierului istoric din Bucuresti care sa il protejeze 
intr-adevar.
   
  Cristian,
  - Grupul Civic Bucuresti

Romania News <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
            
Romania comunista in 1964 nu a participat la sedinta UNESCO / ICOMOS care a 
adoptat "Carta de la Venetia" si nu a participat nici la "Carta de la 
Washington" din 1987.
  Comunistii au urât (au dezagreat) Regatul Roman si au vrut sa distruga si sa 
puna in umbra toate ctitoriile si implinirile acelor ani de civilizatie.
  Din pacate nu numai comunistii nu au aplicat aceste tratate internationale. 
  Dupa 1990 societatea romaneasca a alunecat inspre dispute aiuristice, puse la 
cale de sistemul de zvonaci ai securistilor, pentru a distrage atentia de la 
deceniul furturilor nationale (din anii '90), furturi ale sistemului de 
securisti si fosti lingai de os comunist.
  Daca in prezent, toate tarile din Uniunea Europeana, SUA, Canada si tarile 
civilizate au o lege nationala care sa cuprinda aceste tratate internationale 
despre "Ariile Urbane Istorice" sau "Oarasele Istorice" sau "Cartierele 
Istorice", Romania are o legislatie in domeniu foarte slaba, care permite 
distrugerea (cu buna stiinta, la cheremul hotilor si bisnitarilor din politica 
si din primarii), legislatia romaneasca permite distrugerea zonei istorice a 
oraselor.
   
  Mai jos este "Carta de la Washington" (1987) pentru a vedea marea prapastie 
dintre legea romaneasca si tratatele internationale si legile nationale ale 
altor tari civilizate.
   
                  [PDF-86 Kb] 
  
CHARTER FOR THE CONSERVATION OF HISTORIC TOWNS AND URBAN AREAS 
(Washington Charter - 1987)
  

Adopted by ICOMOS General Assembly in Washington D.C., October 1987



PREAMBLE AND DEFINITIONS

All urban communities, whether they have developed gradually over time or have 
been created deliberately, are an expression of the diversity of societies 
throughout history. 

This charter concerns historic urban areas, large and small, including cities, 
towns and historic centres or quarters, together with their natural and 
man-made environments. Beyond their role as historical documents, these areas 
embody the values of traditional urban cultures. Today many such areas are 
being threatened, physically degraded, damaged or even destroyed, by the impact 
of the urban development that follows industrialisation in societies 
everywhere. 

Faced with this dramatic situation, which often leads to irreversible cultural, 
social and even economic losses, the International Council on Monuments and 
Sites (ICOMOS) deems it necessary to draw up an international charter for 
historic towns and urban areas that will complement the "International Charter 
for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites," usually referred 
to as "The Venice Charter." This new text defines the principles, objectives, 
and methods necessary for the conservation of historic towns and urban areas. 
It also seeks to promote the harmony of both private and community life in 
these areas and to encourage the preservation of those cultural properties, 
however modest in scale, that constitute the memory of mankind. 

As set out in the UNESCO "Recommendation Concerning the Safeguarding and 
Contemporary Role of Historic Areas" (Warsaw - Nairobi, 1976), and also in 
various other international instruments, "the conservation of historic towns 
and urban areas" is understood to mean those steps necessary for the 
protection, conservation and restoration of such towns and areas as well as 
their development and harmonious adaptation to contemporary life. 

PRINCIPLES AND OBJECTIVES

1. In order to be most effective, the conservation of historic towns and other 
historic urban areas should be an integral part of coherent policies of 
economic and social development and of urban and regional planning at every 
level.

2. Qualities to be preserved include the historic character of the town or 
urban area and all those material and spiritual elements that express this 
character, especially:


    a) Urban patterns as defined by lots and streets;

b) Relationships between buildings and green and open spaces;

c) The formal appearance, interior and exterior, of buildings as defined by 
scale, size, style, construction, materials, colour and decoration;

d) The relationship between the town or urban area and its surrounding setting, 
both natural and man-made; and

e) The various functions that the town or urban area has acquired over time.
  Any threat to these qualities would compromise the authenticity of the 
historic town or urban area.

3. The participation and the involvement of the residents are essential for the 
success of the conservation programme and should be encouraged. The 
conservation of historic towns and urban areas concerns their residents first 
of all.

4. Conservation in a historic town or urban area demands prudence, a systematic 
approach and discipline. Rigidity should be avoided since individual cases may 
present specific problems.

METHODS AND INSTRUMENTS

5. Planning for the conservation of historic towns and urban areas should be 
preceded by multidisciplinary studies.

Conservation plans must address all relevant factors including archaeology, 
history, architecture, techniques, sociology and economics.

The principal objectives of the conservation plan should be clearly stated as 
should the legal, administrative and financial measures necessary to attain 
them.

The conservation plan should aim at ensuring a harmonious relationship between 
the historic urban areas and the town as a whole.

The conservation plan should determine which buildings must be preserved, which 
should be preserved under certain circumstances and which, under quite 
exceptional circumstances, might be expendable.

Before any intervention, existing conditions in the area should be thoroughly 
documented.

The conservation plan should be supported by the residents of the historic area.

6. Until a conservation plan has been adopted, any necessary conservation 
activity should be carried out in accordance with the principles and the aims 
of this Charter and the Venice Charter.

7. Continuing maintenance is crucial to the effective conservation of a 
historic town or urban area.

8. New functions and activities should be compatible with the character of the 
historic town or urban area.

Adaptation of these areas to contemporary life requires the careful 
installation or improvement of public service facilities.

9. The improvement of housing should be one of the basic objectives of 
conservation.

10. When it is necessary to construct new buildings or adapt existing ones, the 
existing spatial layout should be respected, especially in terms of scale and 
lot size.

The introduction of contemporary elements in harmony with the surroundings 
should not be discouraged since such features can contribute to the enrichment 
of an area.

11. Knowledge of the history of a historic town or urban area should be 
expanded through archaeological investigation and appropriate preservation of 
archaeological findings.

12. Traffic inside a historic town or urban area must be controlled and parking 
areas must be planned so that they do not damage the historic fabric or its 
environment.

13. When urban or regional planning provides for the construction of major 
motorways, they must not penetrate a historic town or urban area, but they 
should improve access to them.

14. Historic towns should be protected against natural disasters and nuisances 
such as pollution and vibrations in order to safeguard the heritage and for the 
security and well-being of the residents.

Whatever the nature of a disaster affecting a historic town or urban area, 
preventative and repair measures must be adapted to the specific character of 
the properties concerned.

15. In order to encourage their participation and involvement, a general 
information programme should be set up for all residents, beginning with 
children of school age.

16. Specialised training should be provided for all those professions concerned 
with conservation.


  Charter on the Conservation of Historic Towns and Urban Areas - 1987 
[Français] [Español]

    
---------------------------------
    © ICOMOS
http://www.international.icomos.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mise à jour: 05/06/2003 -   
    
---------------------------------
  


        
 



    
---------------------------------
  Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the 
boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail 
  

                         

       
---------------------------------
 All new Yahoo! Mail - 
---------------------------------
Get a sneak peak at messages with a handy reading pane.

Raspunde prin e-mail lui