Charlemagne

The Norwegian option

Those strange European countries that have kept out of the European 
Union

THE mention of Norway or Switzerland tends to bring a strange gleam to 
the eye of British Eurosceptics. This is not because they have a deep 
love of alpine pastures or misty fjords. Rather it is because the 
Norwegians and Swiss are the only two decent-sized western European 
nations who have resisted the temptation to join the 25-country 
European Union. What is more, they are extremely rich. Norway and 
Switzerland boast the highest incomes per person of any European 
countries, bar micro-sized Luxembourg.

The wealth of Norway and Switzerland is arguably more a cause than a 
consequence of their decisions not to join the EU. Norway is one of the 
biggest oil-and-gas producers in the world, and Switzerland has long 
been richer than the European norm. But, at the very least, the two 
countries have demonstrated that it is possible to stay out of the EU 
and still prosper. On a recent pilgrimage to Oslo, Peter Hitchens, a 
Eurosceptic British journalist, discovered a “real nation which 
controls its own destiny”.

But does it? When Norwegian voters rejected membership of the EU in 
1994, Norway opted instead to join the European Economic Area. The EEA 
gives it access to the EU's internal market and its “four freedoms”: 
freedom of movement for goods, services, people and capital. But this 
comes at a price. The Norwegians are obliged to accept every single 
piece of internal-market legislation, and they have no vote on these 
laws. Norway had to restructure its entire natural-gas industry to 
satisfy the EU's competition authorities. All European environmental 
and social legislation has also had to be adopted, including those 
irksome EU regulations on working-time and parental leave that drive 
British right-wingers to distraction. Norway even makes a sizeable 
contribution to the EU budget—as large as that made by a 
comparable-sized EU member, such as Denmark.

All this has led many to conclude that Norway would actually be better 
off joining the EU. At least it would have some say over all the 
legislation it is forced to adopt. Jens Stoltenberg, leader of Norway's 
opposition Labour Party, bemoans his country's “fax democracy”, in 
which officials sit by the fax machine waiting for the latest directive 
from Brussels to arrive.

But there are still many areas of EU policy from which Norway remains 
genuinely independent. Unlike the ten countries that joined the EU this 
year, the Norwegians are under no obligation to adopt the euro. Norway 
is not bound by the EU's embryonic common foreign policy. Perhaps most 
significantly, from the viewpoint of a maritime nation, it has not 
signed up to the EU's common fisheries policy. The Norwegians have been 
able to maintain their own 200-mile coastal exclusion zone, which 
remains well stocked with fish, unlike the EU's grossly depleted 
waters. Nor are they paying members of the common agricultural 
policy—although before free-marketeers cheer too much, it should be 
conceded that both Norway and Switzerland subsidise their farmers far 
more heavily even than the EU.

The cuckoo-clock model

For those who find even the Norwegian relationship with the EU a little 
too intimate, Switzerland offers a more detached one. The Swiss 
rejected membership of the EEA in a referendum in 1992. That has meant 
that, rather than having guaranteed access to the four freedoms of the 
internal market offered to Norway, Switzerland has had painstakingly to 
negotiate agreements sector-by-sector. By and large, its diplomats have 
been remarkably successful. Since 2002, all Swiss citizens have been 
free to live and work anywhere in the EU. Swiss multinationals enjoy 
full access to the European market. But the Swiss have more freedom 
than the Norwegians to opt out of bits of legislation they dislike. EU 
limits on working hours do not apply in Switzerland; nor does the 
demand that sales tax be set at a minimum of 15%. Above all, 
Switzerland is able to retain its tradition of direct democracy. The 
constitutional provision that laws can be thrown out by citizens' 
ballots is incompatible with the EU's demand that all would-be members 
implement all 80,000 pages of EU law.

The downside of this sturdy independence, however, is a lingering sense 
of insecurity and a feeling that Swiss business is losing 
competitiveness because it is excessively sheltered. Goods and services 
are often much more expensive in Switzerland than in the EU, and Swiss 
growth has been feeble recently. The Swiss are also uncomfortably aware 
that, as a nation of 7m negotiating with a behemoth of 455m, they can 
always be leant on. When negotiations with the EU over banking secrecy 
were going badly recently, Swiss travellers to Germany suddenly found 
that their documents were being checked more rigorously, causing huge 
queues at the border.

Will Switzerland and Norway eventually throw in the towel and join the 
European mainstream? There is not much sign of a change of heart in the 
short term. But in the longer run, history seems to point only one way. 
The four-country European Free Trade Association, to which Switzerland 
and Norway, along with Iceland and Liechtenstein, belong, used to have 
a much larger membership. But Britain, Denmark and Ireland joined the 
EU in the 1970s; and Austria, Sweden and Finland quit in favour of the 
EU in 1995. Even some of the officials who run EFTA seem to believe 
that it is only a matter of time before their organisation is wound up.

Yet it is also just possible that things could go the other way. 
Switzerland and Norway are outside the EU mainly because their 
governments could not win referendums to join. A number of EU countries 
will hold referendums on the new constitution over the next two years. 
Those that reject the constitution will have the right to stay in the 
EU—but, if they are a small minority, they might have to negotiate a 
new kind of relationship. And if that happens, the Swiss and Norwegians 
might end up as role-models, rather than eccentric exceptions.

(The Economist, Oct 9, 2004)






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/RR.olB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

EuroAtlantic Club: http://www.europe.org.ro/euroatlantic_club/ 

***
Birou de traduceri autorizate. Contact: Oana Gheorghiu - 252.1947 / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/romania_eu_list/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Raspunde prin e-mail lui