FORUM 18 NEWS SERVICE, Oslo, Norway
 <http://www.forum18.org/> http://www.forum18.org/

The right to believe, to worship and witness
The right to change one's belief or religion
The right to join together and express one's belief

This article was published by F18News on: 15 December 2006

 <http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=889> ROMANIA: Controversial
Religion Law's passing violated parliamentary processes
By Felix Corley, Forum 18 News Service < <http://www.forum18.org>
http://www.forum18.org>

The passage of Romania's controversial new Religion Law broke parliamentary
procedures, Forum 18 News Service has learnt. Members of the Chamber of
Deputies were not given the five days that Romanian law requires for them to
consider the Law. Paul Negrut, who leads the Baptist Union and Evangelical
Alliance, told Forum 18 that "it was totally against rules and procedures -
like an avalanche." The Law - which has still not been published - now goes
to Romanian President Traian Basescu, who has 20 days to sign the law,
return it to parliament for further work, or refer it to the Constitutional
Court. Negrut told Forum 18 that "If we get direct support from the
international community, then the President will have the stamina to send it
back to parliament." Adventist pastor Adrian Bocaneanu told Forum 18 of the
need "to educate the political class on their responsibility to take a stand
for the principle [of religious freedom] rather than an opportunistic
approach."

Romania's controversial new Religion Law - which is opposed by many
religious minorities and human rights groups - gained final parliamentary
approval in the Chamber of Deputies on 13 December. Forum 18 News Service
has learnt that deputies did not have the required five days to consider the
report and amended text from the Chamber's Juridical and Human Rights
committees before the text was debated and voted on in plenary session.

The Law - which has still not been published - was rushed through parliament
with such great speed that many religious communities were unaware of the
latest moves (see F18News 12 December 2006
<http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=887>
http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=887). It now goes to President
Traian Basescu for him to sign into law. He has twenty days to sign it,
return it to parliament for further work or refer it to the Constitutional
Court to determine whether provisions in the Law violate the Constitution.

Forum 18 has been unable to reach Bogdan Tataru-Cazaban, presidential
advisor on religion, to find out what course of action he will recommend to
the President. His office told Forum 18 on 15 December that he has been
"very busy working on this Law and on other matters".

The Baptist Union is preparing a letter to President Basescu, urging him not
to sign the Law. "This Law must be brought into accord with international
accords on religious freedom," Paul Negrut, the president of the Baptist
Union and head of the Evangelical Alliance, told Forum 18 from Oradea on 14
December. "If we get direct support from the international community then
the President will have the stamina to send it back to parliament." However,
the dominant Romanian Orthodox Church has given the Law its strong backing.

The Chamber of Deputies - the lower house of parliament - approved the
government-backed Law on 13 December with 220 in favour, one against, one
abstention and two who failed to vote, the Chamber's website reported. The
bill had been approved without discussion in the Senate, the upper house of
parliament, in December 2005. It was only on 12 December that the Chamber of
Deputies arranged to debate and vote on the Law the following day.

Negrut reported that a parliamentary insider had told him that the report
and amended text of the draft of the joint committees - produced on 7
December - had reached the leadership of the Chamber of Deputies only at 7
am on 13 December and was only distributed to deputies at 11 am. "People
told me that most deputies never even looked at the text, they just flicked
through it," Negrut told Forum 18. "They were just a voting machine. It was
totally against rules and procedures - like an avalanche."

Dorina Nastase, head of the Bucharest-based Romanian Center for Global
Studies and part of the coalition of NGOs which opposes the Law, is equally
suspicious over the way it has been adopted. "The whole process was more
than unusual," she told Forum 18 on 14 December.

Adrian Sorescu, a lawyer with the Bucharest-based Pro Democracy Association,
confirmed to Forum 18 on 15 December that the rush to conclude the Law in
the Chamber of Deputies does indeed appear to violate parliamentary
procedure. He pointed out that Article 69 paragraph 2 of the procedures of
the Chamber says that "the report will be printed and distributed to the
deputies at least three days before the day that was established for the
debate on the draft law within the plenary session of the Chamber". In
addition, when the Chamber has the final decision on a law - as was the case
with the Religion Law, which had already been approved in the Senate - the
time between the distribution of the committees' report and the debate
within the plenary session has to be at least five days.

However, although the Chamber of Deputies press service confirmed to Forum
18 on 15 December that the committees' report with the text of the Law had
reached the deputies only on the day of the vote, it insisted that all
parliamentary procedures were followed correctly.

Nastase - herself a Greek Catholic - said that parliament's adoption of the
law was a shock for her church. "No-one expected the Law to be adopted so
quickly," she told Forum 18. "Religious minorities were hoping that by
participating in discussions they could change the Law for the better. They
were wrong - it was all for show." She said that while the Greek Catholics
were mainly concerned about property issues, Protestants are mainly
concerned at the "hierarchy of faiths" with different rights enshrined in
the Law.

The Greek Catholic Church - which was banned during the Communist period -
has welcomed in principle the idea of a religion law which would establish
proper legal status for religious communities. However, as its spokesperson
Jula Florin told Forum 18 from Oradea on 14 December, it regrets that the
Law adopted by parliament fails to settle the Church's legal ownership of
Greek Catholic churches that were confiscated by the Communist regime. "It
was necessary to resolve this issue before the adoption of the Law." The
Church regards the failure to do so as "discrimination".

The Baptist Union is concerned mainly over five issues.

They believe the new Law's provisions giving state funding to recognised
clergy and religious workers will make religious communities dependent on
the state and increase government control over them.

Baptists also fear that the criminalisation of causing offence to religious
symbols could prevent people of one faith speaking about other faiths.

The requirement that denominational schools will have to provide pupils of
other faiths with religious education of their faiths will eliminate
specific denominational education, and cause undue burdens on denominational
schools.

It believes the rules over denominational cemeteries are too vague and could
lead to continuing denial of access to members of minority faiths being
buried in the only available local cemeteries.

And it regards the requirement for new religious communities to have 0.1
percent of the population - about 22,000 people - before they can register
as a denomination as "absolutely incredible", while those wanting to
register a lower-level religious organisation need 300 members, compared to
just three people need to register other NGOs.

The executive director of the Baptist Union, Mihai Suciu, said he feared the
Law will also lead to local restrictions on religious minorities. "It's my
personal view that the Law opens the door to arbitrary interpretations by
local officials which could restrict religious activity," he told Forum 18
on 14 December.

Samuel Caba of the River of Revival Pentecostal Church in Arad told Forum 18
that he also opposed the new Law, and would be working with other
independent Protestant churches to protest against it.

The Jehovah's Witnesses - who have expressed concern over provisions of
earlier drafts of the Law - told Forum 18 that they are withholding comment
on the final text until they have had the opportunity to study the - not yet
published - final text of the Law.

Romanita Iordache of the Bucharest-based Accept, which has also been
involved in the coalition against the Law, is concerned that, although the
number of years a religious community has existed before it can apply to
become a denomination was reduced in late stages from 12 years to six, the
restrictions on minority faiths remain.

The coalition remains concerned about "the lack of emphasis on equality and
neutrality" and the impact over the long term of the three-tier system of
state-recognition. "We suggested similar rights and benefits for religious
associations and denominations, with few exceptions," she told Forum 18. She
said the coalition objected to the numbers required to gain state
recognition, the length of time they have to exist for and the requirement
that members be citizens.

It also objected to the state's role in assessing the doctrines of religious
communities applying for registration. "We think that it should be a mere
check as government institutions do not have the ability or mandate to
decide over the creed, structure or over any other internal matters of the
religions."

The coalition also argued that declaring sacred goods inalienable before
pending conflicts are solved is wrong. "This is going to be a tough one for
the Greek Catholics," she noted. "We also wanted clarifications on the
provisions of cemeteries - a very sensitive issue which is badly managed by
the Law." The coalition also objected to the new offence against religious
symbols.

Also complaining of "shortcomings" in the Law is Adventist pastor Adrian
Bocaneanu. "Unfortunately some of the religious bodies which participated in
the development of the Law supported or even promoted provisions which are
definitely discriminatory," he told Forum 18 from Bucharest on 14 December,
"such as different levels of state recognition for religious organisations
and the much-debated ban on defamation of religious beliefs and practices."

Looking back on his involvement in earlier drafts of the Law, he commented:
"Some representatives of other faiths were glad to promote a Law that
recognised their rights but made it very difficult for other religious
organisations to reach the same status. I think this is dangerous."

Bocaneanu believes it is now important to educate "citizens on the meaning,
importance and applications of religious freedom, to educate the churches to
find down-to-earth solutions to potentially divisive issues and to educate
the political class on their responsibility to take a stand for the
principle rather than an opportunistic approach".

----------------------------

Vali
"Noble blood is an accident of fortune; noble actions are the chief mark of
greatness." (Carlo Goldoni)
"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know
peace." (Jimi Hendrix)

Raspunde prin e-mail lui