Jose Catena wrote: > Also, I don't know if I should submit patches for msvc build,
I "mantain" the makefile-based builder, which is the core build backend AND supports Microsoft compilers (sort of). Ged Murphy maintains the new Visual Studio project generator (which is based on the makefile-based builder), while the old project generator is a total orphan > I suppose I > should even if it is not the official way, because I find msvc/gnuc > conditionals there, but the msvc part is broken in many places. yes, it's supposed to work. Yes, we accept fixes. No, you can't link with the Microsoft linker when using the makefile-based builder (yet), because I didn't write the build rules for it (yet). Yes, you will be able to, eventually, and then use the makefile-based Visual Studio projects > I fixed > ntoskrnl and its dependencies issues (many in crt) for msvc. Please let me > know if I should submit such patches or not, and what would be the proper > way to submit these and any other patches. I suppose that initially I should > send them to someone for review, right? Post them on bugzilla, assign them to me and Cc [email protected] > I'm very pleased with the improvements in kd and windbg support. I was > working on it and found that I wasted some efforts. No problem, I'll check > svn more frequently for changes, but I'd like to know if there is a list > somewhere with a description of who is currently doing or planning to do > what, to avoid doing the same as someone else again. [email protected] and [email protected] are your men. I'd still recommend using IRC though, as most of the developers hang out there > and then incorporating to it a new high performance scheduler Alex Ionescu will wear your spleen like a hat for this. Discuss it with him first if you want the remotest possibility of your scheduler being accepted in the tree _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
