Javier this isn't funny. ReactOS is serious business. 2010/4/15 Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo <[email protected]>
> well, it will be useful whenever it has to :) > so, i dont see it as a bad commit after all, just funny :P > > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Andrew Faulds <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Yes, but we get "donations" on all sorts of unnecessary things. >> We really need "donations" in *useful areas* like, say, USB. >> >> >> On 15 April 2010 10:25, Peter Millerchip <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> To be fair: >>> >>> 1. The guy donated his code to ReactOS. Think of it like a gift to us >>> - it might not be what we really wanted, but it's still rude to insult >>> a gift. >>> >>> 2. This isn't "support" for PCMCIA, it's a stub - he said so himself. >>> ReactOS does not support PCMCIA yet. >>> >>> 3. Windows supported PCMCIA before USB, and we are just copying >>> Windows after all! :) >>> >>> On 15 April 2010 10:11, Andrew Faulds <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > You mean we're supporting an interface no-one needs before the biggest >>> gap >>> > in ReactOS I/O support? >>> > >>> > 2010/4/15 Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo <[email protected]> >>> >> >>> >> ReactOS has PCMCIA support before USB >>> >> lol :) >>> >> >>> >> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Aleksey Bragin <[email protected] >>> > >>> >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> I fully agree with Ged. I know it's fun to create something from >>> scratch >>> >>> (I used and will still do, of course) and work in an explored area, >>> however >>> >>> I think there should be some control. If you really want to work on >>> that and >>> >>> nothing else - we have rosapps/drivers. In my opinion, trunk has no >>> place >>> >>> for non-working drivers which aren't really a top priority (at least, >>> I >>> >>> didn't include fastfat_new to the build process so noone wastes time >>> >>> compiling a driver which is needed only by 2 or 3 developers). >>> >>> >>> >>> WBR, >>> >>> Aleksey. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Apr 15, 2010, at 11:05 AM, Ged Murphy wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> I don't mean to sound like a broken record, and I also understand >>> that >>> >>>> the project allows people to work on whatever they want to. But with >>> the >>> >>>> project in such a state at the moment, is a pcmcia bus driver really >>> the >>> >>>> best thing to be working on? >>> >>>> I'm all for project freedom, but you would hope people to have the >>> >>>> diligence to work on areas which might help to stop the project from >>> >>>> failing. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Maybe I just don't get it anymore and I'm behind the times, but what >>> >>>> happened to the days when people used to work on important things? >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Your nagging ex-dev, >>> >>>> Ged. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>> >>>> From: [email protected] >>> >>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >>> [email protected] >>> >>>> Sent: 15 April 2010 02:59 >>> >>>> To: [email protected] >>> >>>> Subject: [ros-diffs] [cgutman] 46876: [PCMCIA] - Add a mostly >>> stubbed >>> >>>> PCMCIA driver - pcmcia.c is complete but fdo.c and pdo.c are >>> completely >>> >>>> unimplemented >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Author: cgutman >>> >>>> Date: Thu Apr 15 03:59:15 2010 >>> >>>> New Revision: 46876 >>> >>>> >>> >>>> URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=46876&view=rev >>> >>>> Log: >>> >>>> [PCMCIA] >>> >>>> - Add a mostly stubbed PCMCIA driver >>> >>>> - pcmcia.c is complete but fdo.c and pdo.c are completely >>> unimplemented >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Added: >>> >>>> trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/ >>> >>>> trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/fdo.c (with props) >>> >>>> trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/pcmcia.c (with props) >>> >>>> trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/pcmcia.h (with props) >>> >>>> trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/pcmcia.rbuild (with props) >>> >>>> trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/pcmcia.rc (with props) >>> >>>> trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/pdo.c (with props) >>> >>>> Modified: >>> >>>> trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/directory.rbuild >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>>> Ros-dev mailing list >>> >>>> [email protected] >>> >>>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> Ros-dev mailing list >>> >>> [email protected] >>> >>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> Ros-dev mailing list >>> >> [email protected] >>> >> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Andrew Faulds (andrewros) >>> > http://ajf.me/ >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Ros-dev mailing list >>> > [email protected] >>> > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >>> > >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ros-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Andrew Faulds (andrewros) >> http://ajf.me/ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ros-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
