What about making the relink depend on the modification of the spec file? Le mercredi 16 juin 2010 21:59:31, Timo Kreuzer a écrit : > Sylvain Petreolle wrote: > > I fully agree on this. > > This will also remove the need to rebuild the dll (and possibly other > > dependant modules) if we have to disable a registration for > > testing/debugging purposes. > > Speaking of dlls and dependencies: I think our current approach (all > modules depend on the dlls it links) is retarded. A clean rebuild of > ntdll leads to a massive relink orgy. I suggest to use libraries from > RosBE by default. To make sure we have all exports we ever need, we > should build our own import libraries with all exports for all windows > versions. We could begin with an rbuild switch that tells whether to use > the import lib from reactos or from RosBE. another approach would be to > seperate the dll target from the import library target, so that remake > ntdll will not cause the import library to be rebuild. another problem I > see with the current dependencies is that you can't remove some modules > from the build because other modules depend on it. > > Regards, > Timo > > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > Ros-dev@reactos.org > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
