Sounds like a plan. And then gradually implement necessary kernel functionality as it is needed. On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 01:18:36 +1100, Jérôme Gardou <jerome.gar...@laposte.net> wrote:
So, for kernel we keep our own importibs, adding exports one after
the other while we implement them, and for user mode dlls we keep
win7 compatible ones?
We need an official stance on this matter.
Le 13/11/2010 03:10, Ged Murphy a écrit :
The target is only win2k3 in the kernel. Everything
else is open to discussion (in fact, IMO even the
kernel compatibility is open to discussion)
You should, and must, provide as much functionality as
possible with the latest versions of Windows.
You can still provide many of the capabilities of Windows 7
using only an NT5.2 kernel. It's only the internal architecture
which limits this, and in terms of many win7 capabilities, this
kernel isn't a limiting factor.
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
-- Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime. Give a man religion and he will die praying for a fish. |
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev