Spoke with Amine and Daniel. I've agreed to the lesser evil of bundling the FULL cmake. Reasons are if we want the BE to be flexible enough to be used for more than just building ROS, we can't gimp cmake with the belief that no one will need the things we didn't include. This is again on Windows. I remain uninvolved with decisions about the Linux BE.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Colin Finck <[email protected]> wrote: > Timo Kreuzer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> My vote on this: >> CMake: bundle it, optional on installation >> x64/arm: create individual installers >> > > * CMake: bundle it, go for the (minimal) version without an installer. It's > nothing "exotic" to install after all, just put it together with the other > utilities in RosBE. > > * x64/arm: If build tool sizes are staying like this, create individual > installers. Just for testing, I'll try an x86/x64 multilib build of Binutils > and GCC though, would be nice to know how much smaller it is compared to > separate x86 and x64 compilers. > > So in general, I agree with Timo :-) > > > - Colin > > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
