Timo Kreuzer wrote: > Am 30.09.2011 15:08, schrieb Ged Murphy: > > Why are there still 2 build systems? > If you were present at the last meeting, you should know the answer.
Very helpful. Thanks for the explanation Alex. > > I'm sure you all don't want to hear me rant about best practice and how this > > should be fixed, but someone needs to step in and try to define some sort of > > base development platform. > No, we don't want to hear you to rant. > Ranting is something we can prefectly do ourselves, and it doesn't help > fixing the problem, believe me, I've tried ;-) Well maybe it would help to fix the problem if someone pointed out why this is a bad idea instead of ranting about things like "you broke the cmake build" or "well it works fine with rbuild on windows" or "someone broke the linux build machine again" > Instead you could have come up with a practical solution month ago. Or > even better fix the issue. > Hint: it's not like BEs fall from the sky and buildbot scripts are > generating themselves. I'll fix the issue quite simply. Until cmake is ready, it shouldn't be used by anyone for development. If it's still work in progress then it's not part of the official toolset and should be treated as being broken. You can't have half of the developers using one thing and the other half using another. Everyone working on reactos should be using the same build environment, which is also the build environment that the build machine should be using. Anyone who chooses to move away from this environment is more than welcome to, but any issues this brings are for those people to solve along with the help of the willing community. Ged. _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
