VBox 4.0.x was indeed broken, but 4.1.x is a lot better. It also is able to use extended CPU virtualisation functions, present from Nehalem upwards, thus its running on windows testbot.
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012, at 09:46 AM, Александр wrote: 07.06.2012, 01:53, "cae...@myopera.com" <cae...@myopera.com>: Works fine on VBox 4.1.16? We kinda dont support Vbox 3 as its... old and having problems with com output? W00T?! I used to be told by a lot of devs that Vbox 4 is buggy suxx, and VirtualBox 3.2.14 is a better one. So where is the truth? On Wed, Jun 6, 2012, at 03:57 PM, Sylvain Petreolle wrote: Kind regards, Sylvain Petreolle ____________________________________________________________ De : Aleksey Bragin <[1]alek...@reactos.org> À : ReactOS Development List <[2]ros-dev@reactos.org> Envoyé le : Mercredi 6 juin 2012 14h45 Objet : [ros-dev] Debug log problems -- With best regards Caemyr _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [3]Ros-dev@reactos.org [4]http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev -- С наилучшими пожеланиями, Александр. _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [5]Ros-dev@reactos.org [6]http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev -- With best regards Caemyr References 1. mailto:alek...@reactos.org 2. mailto:ros-dev@reactos.org 3. mailto:Ros-dev@reactos.org 4. http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev 5. mailto:Ros-dev@reactos.org 6. http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
