VBox 4.0.x was indeed broken, but 4.1.x is a lot better. It also is able to use extended CPU virtualisation functions, present from Nehalem upwards, thus its running on windows testbot.
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012, at 09:46 AM, Александр wrote: 07.06.2012, 01:53, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>: Works fine on VBox 4.1.16? We kinda dont support Vbox 3 as its... old and having problems with com output? W00T?! I used to be told by a lot of devs that Vbox 4 is buggy suxx, and VirtualBox 3.2.14 is a better one. So where is the truth? On Wed, Jun 6, 2012, at 03:57 PM, Sylvain Petreolle wrote: Kind regards, Sylvain Petreolle ____________________________________________________________ De : Aleksey Bragin <[1][email protected]> À : ReactOS Development List <[2][email protected]> Envoyé le : Mercredi 6 juin 2012 14h45 Objet : [ros-dev] Debug log problems -- With best regards Caemyr _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [3][email protected] [4]http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev -- С наилучшими пожеланиями, Александр. _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [5][email protected] [6]http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev -- With best regards Caemyr References 1. mailto:[email protected] 2. mailto:[email protected] 3. mailto:[email protected] 4. http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev 5. mailto:[email protected] 6. http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
