yeah, well.. the "politically correct" answer But i doubt it`s the actual answer
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Pierre Schweitzer <pie...@reactos.org> wrote: > The ReactOS Foundation application got officially rejected "because of > the numbers of slots available and the high # of terrific applications." > > On 03/03/2015 02:08 PM, Hermès BÉLUSCA - MAÏTO wrote: > > We've been yet again rejected for the same "reasons" as before (i.e. no > apparent reasons)? > > > > Cheers, > > Hermès. > > > > -----Message d'origine----- > > De : Ros-dev [mailto:ros-dev-boun...@reactos.org] De la part de Pierre > Schweitzer > > Envoyé : lundi 2 mars 2015 22:23 > > À : ReactOS Development List > > Objet : [ros-dev] GSoC :: application rejected > > > > Dear all, > > > > The ReactOS Foundation application to GSoC has been rejected this year > again. Statistics are not reliable after all. > > > > In any case, keep up the good work. We don't need Google to be the bests > at what we do. > > > > Cheers, > > -- > > Pierre Schweitzer <pierre at reactos.org> System & Network > Administrator Senior Kernel Developer ReactOS Deutschland e.V. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Ros-dev mailing list > > Ros-dev@reactos.org > > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev > > > > > -- > Pierre Schweitzer <pie...@reactos.org> > System & Network Administrator > Senior Kernel Developer > ReactOS Deutschland e.V. > > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > Ros-dev@reactos.org > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
