If it compiles, it's good :)
But isn't this some GCC thing? Do you use RosBE ARM? I doubt it even works at all.

Am 23.04.2015 um 14:27 schrieb [email protected]:
Author: cwittich
Date: Thu Apr 23 12:27:08 2015
New Revision: 67368

URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=67368&view=rev
Log:
[CRT]
add ARM stub for chkstk_ms (Timo please review)

Added:
     trunk/reactos/lib/sdk/crt/except/arm/chkstk_ms.s   (with props)

Added: trunk/reactos/lib/sdk/crt/except/arm/chkstk_ms.s
URL: 
http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/trunk/reactos/lib/sdk/crt/except/arm/chkstk_ms.s?rev=67368
==============================================================================
--- trunk/reactos/lib/sdk/crt/except/arm/chkstk_ms.s    (added)
+++ trunk/reactos/lib/sdk/crt/except/arm/chkstk_ms.s    [iso-8859-1] Thu Apr 23 
12:27:08 2015
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+/*
+ * COPYRIGHT:         See COPYING in the top level directory
+ * PROJECT:           ReactOS system libraries
+ * PURPOSE:           Implementation of _chkstk and _alloca_probe
+ * FILE:              lib/sdk/crt/except/arm/chkstk_ms.s
+ * PROGRAMMER:        Timo Kreuzer ([email protected])
+ *                    Yuntian Zhang ([email protected])
+ */
+
+/* INCLUDES ******************************************************************/
+
+#include <kxarm.h>
+
+/* CODE **********************************************************************/
+    TEXTAREA
+
+MsgUnimplemented ASCII "Unimplemented", CR, LF, NUL
+
+    LEAF_ENTRY ___chkstk_ms
+    UNIMPLEMENTED chkstk_ms
+    bx lr
+    LEAF_END __chkstk_ms
+
+    LEAF_ENTRY __alloca_probe
+    UNIMPLEMENTED alloca_probe
+    bx lr
+    LEAF_END __alloca_probe
+
+    END
+/* EOF */

Propchange: trunk/reactos/lib/sdk/crt/except/arm/chkstk_ms.s
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     svn:eol-style = native





Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

Reply via email to