This change sounds wrong to me too. On 5 June 2016 at 08:26, Thomas Faber <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2016-06-05 01:29, [email protected] wrote: > > - rcDesk.left = GetSystemMetrics(SM_XVIRTUALSCREEN); > > - rcDesk.top = GetSystemMetrics(SM_YVIRTUALSCREEN); > > - rcDesk.right = rcDesk.left + GetSystemMetrics(SM_CXVIRTUALSCREEN); > > - rcDesk.bottom = rcDesk.top + GetSystemMetrics(SM_CYVIRTUALSCREEN); > > + rcDesk.left = GetSystemMetrics(SM_XVIRTUALSCREEN); > > + rcDesk.top = GetSystemMetrics(SM_YVIRTUALSCREEN); > > + rcDesk.right = GetSystemMetrics(SM_CXVIRTUALSCREEN); > > + rcDesk.bottom = GetSystemMetrics(SM_CYVIRTUALSCREEN); > > Are you sure about this? "CX" normally means width, so right = left + cx > seems more logical. And SM_XVIRUTALSCREEN is probably 0 most of the > time so it would be hard to notice. > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
