There are no disadvantages. Someone though it would be fun to remove useful assertions because they don't really understand them. Best regards, Alex Ionescu
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Michael Fritscher <mich...@fritscher.net> wrote: > Hi, > > hmm, what are disadvantages of these checks? If MS uses them as well these > shouldn't break anything. > > Perfomancewise there shouldn't be a difference, and in release builds they > are disabled anyways, aren't they? > > I only want to get a better unterstanding ;-) > > Best regards, > Michael > >> Thanks for removing stuff that exists in the NT kernel as sanity >> checks -- the entire MS dev team must be wrong, thanks for correcting >> them all :) >> >> Make sure not to ask "anyone can explain these checks? they seem >> useless to me" when removing stuff like this. >> Best regards, >> Alex Ionescu >> >> >> On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 2:30 AM, <dchapys...@svn.reactos.org> wrote: >>> Author: dchapyshev >>> Date: Sat Sep 24 09:30:06 2016 >>> New Revision: 72787 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=72787&view=rev >>> Log: >>> [NTOSKRNL] Remove unneeded sanity checks >>> >>> Modified: >>> trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/include/internal/ke_x.h >>> >>> Modified: trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/include/internal/ke_x.h >>> URL: >>> http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/include/internal/ke_x.h?rev=72787&r1=72786&r2=72787&view=diff >>> ============================================================================== >>> --- trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/include/internal/ke_x.h [iso-8859-1] >>> (original) >>> +++ trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/include/internal/ke_x.h [iso-8859-1] Sat >>> Sep 24 09:30:06 2016 >>> @@ -25,7 +25,6 @@ >>> >>> \ >>> /* Sanity checks */ >>> \ >>> ASSERT(KeGetCurrentIrql() <= APC_LEVEL); >>> \ >>> - ASSERT(_Thread == KeGetCurrentThread()); >>> \ >>> ASSERT((_Thread->SpecialApcDisable <= 0) && >>> \ >>> (_Thread->SpecialApcDisable != -32768)); >>> \ >>> >>> \ >>> @@ -42,7 +41,6 @@ >>> >>> \ >>> /* Sanity checks */ >>> \ >>> ASSERT(KeGetCurrentIrql() <= APC_LEVEL); >>> \ >>> - ASSERT(_Thread == KeGetCurrentThread()); >>> \ >>> ASSERT(_Thread->SpecialApcDisable < 0); >>> \ >>> >>> \ >>> /* Leave region and check if APCs are OK now */ >>> \ >>> @@ -66,7 +64,6 @@ >>> PKTHREAD _Thread = KeGetCurrentThread(); >>> \ >>> >>> \ >>> /* Sanity checks */ >>> \ >>> - ASSERT(_Thread == KeGetCurrentThread()); >>> \ >>> ASSERT((_Thread->KernelApcDisable <= 0) && >>> \ >>> (_Thread->KernelApcDisable != -32768)); >>> \ >>> >>> \ >>> @@ -82,7 +79,6 @@ >>> PKTHREAD _Thread = KeGetCurrentThread(); >>> \ >>> >>> \ >>> /* Sanity checks */ >>> \ >>> - ASSERT(_Thread == KeGetCurrentThread()); >>> \ >>> ASSERT(_Thread->KernelApcDisable < 0); >>> \ >>> >>> \ >>> /* Enable Kernel APCs */ >>> \ >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ros-dev mailing list >> Ros-dev@reactos.org >> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > Ros-dev@reactos.org > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
