Hi,
I completely agree, and that's why I put in comment that INT_MIN stuff.

Hermès

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Ros-dev [mailto:ros-dev-boun...@reactos.org] De la part de Neo Love
Envoyé : vendredi 3 mars 2017 01:26
À : ReactOS Development List
Objet : Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [hbelusca] 73895: [NTGDI]: Few fixes & hacks 
for NtGdiGetGlyphIndicesW, see CORE-12825: - (Fix) Check for integer count 
overflow (per Thomas suggestion), - (Hack#1) Signal the particular calling ca...

If 'cwc' is a pointer or anything that would ever become 64 bits in x64 this 
type of coding needs rewriting using symbolic sizes.
(Such as ULONG_PTR(-1) and similar constructs..)


On 2017-02-24 20.42, Thomas Faber wrote:
> +    /* Check for integer overflow */
> +    if (cwc & 0x80000000) // (INT_MAX + 1) == INT_MIN

L.
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev


_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

Reply via email to