But this breaks modularity, isnt It?

And HAL might become huge

El 10/12/2017 19:11, "Colin Finck" <co...@reactos.org> escribió:

> Hi all,
>
> I have been looking into our HALs recently on the promise that it is a
> huge mess that needs fixing. Well, as a start I could imagine merging
> our 6 possible x86 HALs (Legacy, ACPI, APIC, ACPI+APIC, SMP, SMP+ACPI)
> into a single one, even if Windows ships individual ones. I see many
> advantages of that:
>
> * Less duplications and reduced mess: Right now, the APIC HAL hangs at
> HalpCalibrateStallExecution during boot, a function that has been fixed
> and universally implemented in all non-APIC HALs. The APIC HAL also
> duplicates HalpInitializePICs as HalpInitializeLegacyPIC.
> If you look at the SMP code, it didn't even receive the last build
> system changes and has conflicting implementations for APIC functions.
> A single x86 HAL would ensure that all possible configurations are
> maintained.
>
> * Future-proof: How is one going to implement newer features like x2APIC
> with a structure like that? Would it get another HAL, be integrated into
> the APIC HAL, or what?
> We wouldn't have such problems with a single x86 HAL.
>
> * Less setup work and testing: Currently, 1st stage setup detects the
> computer type and installs the appropriate HAL. As such, every
> additional HAL needs to be added to 1st stage setup code.
> The user is also able to select a custom HAL during setup, even if it
> wouldn't work on the machine. We should give neither the user nor the
> setup the ability to decide. The HAL itself knows best at boot-up what
> features to enable and what not.
>
> * Convenience: The same ReactOS installation could be used on several
> different x86 computers.
>
>
> So is this the way to go or do I miss something important?
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Colin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev@reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

Reply via email to