Author: gadamopoulos
Date: Thu Oct 6 13:06:52 2011
New Revision: 54023
URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=54023&view=rev
Log:
[user32_apitest]
- remove all previous SetActiveWindow tests as they were completely wrong. This
is because changing the z-order of the owner windows is done by SetWindowPos as
tested in the same test suite. However SetActiveWindow calls SetWindowPos
without SWP_NOOWNERZORDER parameter which leads to changing the zorder of owner
windows
Modified:
trunk/rostests/apitests/user32/SetActiveWindow.c
Modified: trunk/rostests/apitests/user32/SetActiveWindow.c
URL:
http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/trunk/rostests/apitests/user32/SetActiveWindow.c?rev=54023&r1=54022&r2=54023&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- trunk/rostests/apitests/user32/SetActiveWindow.c [iso-8859-1] (original)
+++ trunk/rostests/apitests/user32/SetActiveWindow.c [iso-8859-1] Thu Oct 6
13:06:52 2011
@@ -11,15 +11,13 @@
#include "helper.h"
#include <undocuser.h>
-HWND hWnd1, hWnd2, hWnd3, hWnd4;
+HWND hWnd1, hWnd2;
/* FIXME: test for HWND_TOP, etc...*/
static int get_iwnd(HWND hWnd)
{
if(hWnd == hWnd1) return 1;
else if(hWnd == hWnd2) return 2;
- else if(hWnd == hWnd3) return 3;
- else if(hWnd == hWnd4) return 4;
else return 0;
}
@@ -79,31 +77,13 @@
20, 20, 300, 300, NULL, NULL, 0, NULL);
hWnd2 = CreateWindowW(L"ownertest", L"ownertest", WS_OVERLAPPEDWINDOW,
- 20, 350, 300, 300, hWnd1, NULL, 0, NULL);
-
- hWnd3 = CreateWindowW(L"ownertest", L"ownertest", WS_OVERLAPPEDWINDOW,
200, 200, 300, 300, NULL, NULL, 0, NULL);
-
- hWnd4 = CreateWindowW(L"ownertest", L"ownertest", WS_OVERLAPPEDWINDOW,
- 250, 250, 200, 200, hWnd1, NULL, 0, NULL);
}
static void set_default_zorder()
{
- /* show the windows */
- ShowWindow(hWnd1, SW_SHOW);
- UpdateWindow(hWnd1);
- ShowWindow(hWnd2, SW_SHOW);
- UpdateWindow(hWnd2);
- ShowWindow(hWnd3, SW_SHOW);
- UpdateWindow(hWnd3);
- ShowWindow(hWnd4, SW_SHOW);
- UpdateWindow(hWnd4);
-
- SetWindowPos(hWnd3, 0, 0,0,0,0,
SWP_NOSENDCHANGING|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW|SWP_NOACTIVATE);
- SetWindowPos(hWnd1, 0, 0,0,0,0,
SWP_NOSENDCHANGING|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW|SWP_NOACTIVATE);
- SetWindowPos(hWnd2, 0, 0,0,0,0,
SWP_NOSENDCHANGING|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW|SWP_NOACTIVATE);
- SetWindowPos(hWnd4, 0, 0,0,0,0,
SWP_NOSENDCHANGING|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW|SWP_NOACTIVATE);
+ SetWindowPos(hWnd1, 0, 0,0,0,0,
SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW);
+ SetWindowPos(hWnd2, 0, 0,0,0,0,
SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW);
FlushMessages();
empty_message_cache();
@@ -113,198 +93,50 @@
{
DestroyWindow(hWnd1);
DestroyWindow(hWnd2);
- DestroyWindow(hWnd3);
- DestroyWindow(hWnd4);
UnregisterClassW(L"testClass", 0);
}
-#define EXPECT_NEXT(hWnd1, hWnd2) \
- ok(get_iwnd(GetWindow(hWnd1,GW_HWNDNEXT)) == get_iwnd(hWnd2), \
- "After hwnd%d, expected hwnd%d not hwnd%d\n", \
- get_iwnd(hWnd1),
get_iwnd(hWnd2),get_iwnd(GetWindow(hWnd1,GW_HWNDNEXT)) )
-
-#define EXPECT_CHAIN(A,B,C,D,X) \
- EXPECT_NEXT(hWnd##A, hWnd##B); \
- EXPECT_NEXT(hWnd##B, hWnd##C); \
- EXPECT_NEXT(hWnd##C, hWnd##D); \
- EXPECT_NEXT(hWnd##D, 0); \
- EXPECT_ACTIVE(hWnd##X);
-
-/* the actual test begins here */
-
-MSG_ENTRY Activate1_chain[]=
- {{4,WM_NCACTIVATE},
- {4,WM_ACTIVATE},
- {4,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING,SENT,0,SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE | SWP_NOACTIVATE},
- {2,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING,SENT,4,SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE | SWP_NOACTIVATE},
- {1,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING,SENT,2,SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE},
- {1,WM_NCACTIVATE},
- {1,WM_ACTIVATE},
- {4,WM_KILLFOCUS},
- {1,WM_SETFOCUS},
- {0,0}};
-
-MSG_ENTRY Activate2_chain[]=
- {{1,WM_NCACTIVATE},
- {1,WM_ACTIVATE},
- {3,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING,SENT, 0, SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE},
- {3,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGED ,SENT, 0, SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE |
SWP_NOCLIENTMOVE|SWP_NOCLIENTSIZE},
- {3,WM_NCACTIVATE},
- {3,WM_ACTIVATE},
- {1,WM_KILLFOCUS},
- {3,WM_SETFOCUS},
- {0,0}};
-
-MSG_ENTRY Activate3_chain[]=
- {{3,WM_NCACTIVATE},
- {3,WM_ACTIVATE},
- {2,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING, SENT,0, SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE },
- {4,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING, SENT,2, SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE |
SWP_NOACTIVATE},
- {1,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING, SENT,4, SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE |
SWP_NOACTIVATE},
- {2,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGED, SENT,0, SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE |
SWP_NOCLIENTMOVE |SWP_NOCLIENTSIZE },
- {4,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGED, SENT,2, SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE |
SWP_NOACTIVATE |SWP_NOCLIENTMOVE|SWP_NOCLIENTSIZE},
- {1,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGED, SENT,4, SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE |
SWP_NOACTIVATE |SWP_NOCLIENTMOVE|SWP_NOCLIENTSIZE},
+MSG_ENTRY activate2to1_chain[]={
{2,WM_NCACTIVATE},
{2,WM_ACTIVATE},
- {3,WM_KILLFOCUS},
- {2,WM_SETFOCUS},
- {0,0}};
-
-MSG_ENTRY Activate4_chain[]=
- {{2,WM_NCACTIVATE, },
- {2,WM_ACTIVATE},
- {2,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING, SENT ,0 ,SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE |
SWP_NOACTIVATE},
- {4,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING, SENT, 2, SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE |
SWP_NOACTIVATE} ,
- {1,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING, SENT, 4, SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE},
+ {1,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING, SENT,0, SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_NOMOVE},
+ {1,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGED, SENT,0,
SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOCLIENTMOVE|SWP_NOCLIENTSIZE},
{1,WM_NCACTIVATE},
{1,WM_ACTIVATE},
{2,WM_KILLFOCUS},
{1,WM_SETFOCUS},
{0,0}};
-MSG_ENTRY Activate5_chain[]=
- {{1,WM_NCACTIVATE, },
+MSG_ENTRY activate1to2_chain[]={
+ {1,WM_NCACTIVATE},
{1,WM_ACTIVATE},
- {4,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING, SENT, 0 ,SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE},
- {2,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING, SENT, 0, SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE |
SWP_NOACTIVATE},
- {1,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING, SENT, 2, SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE |
SWP_NOACTIVATE},
- {4,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGED, SENT, 0, SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE |
SWP_NOCLIENTMOVE|SWP_NOCLIENTSIZE},
- {4,WM_NCACTIVATE},
- {4,WM_ACTIVATE},
+ {2,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING, SENT,0, SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_NOMOVE},
+ {2,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGED, SENT,0,
SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOCLIENTMOVE|SWP_NOCLIENTSIZE},
+ {2,WM_NCACTIVATE},
+ {2,WM_ACTIVATE},
{1,WM_KILLFOCUS},
- {4,WM_SETFOCUS},
+ {2,WM_SETFOCUS},
{0,0}};
-/*
- some notes about this testcase:
- from the expected series of messages it is obbvious that SetActiveWindow
uses SetWindowPos.
- So the big question is, that if this behaviour (of changing the z order of
owner and owned windows)
- is implemented in SetActiveWindow or SetWindowPos.
- More tests reveal that calling SetWindowPos like this, has the same effect
in the zorder:
- SetWindowPos(hWndX, 0, 0,0,0,0,
SWP_NOSENDCHANGING|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW);
- However if it is called like this it does NOT change the z-order of owner
or owned windows:
- SetWindowPos(hWndX, 0, 0,0,0,0,
SWP_NOSENDCHANGING|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW|SWP_NOACTIVATE);
- So the conclusion is that SetActiveWindow calls Begin/Defer/EndDeferWindow
pos
- moving all affected windows in a batch move operation
-*/
-
-void Test_OwnerWindows()
+void Test_msg_simple()
{
SetCursorPos(0,0);
create_test_windows();
set_default_zorder();
- /* before we start testing SetActiveWindow we have to be sure they are on
the ocrrect order*/
- EXPECT_CHAIN(4,2,1,3,4);
-
- /* move the windows on top in the following order 1 2 3 1 4 */
SetActiveWindow(hWnd1);
FlushMessages();
- EXPECT_CHAIN(4,2,1,3,1);
- COMPARE_CACHE(Activate1_chain);
-
- SetActiveWindow(hWnd3);
- FlushMessages();
- EXPECT_CHAIN(3,4,2,1,3);
- COMPARE_CACHE(Activate2_chain);
+ COMPARE_CACHE(activate2to1_chain);
SetActiveWindow(hWnd2);
FlushMessages();
- EXPECT_CHAIN(2,4,1,3,2);
- COMPARE_CACHE(Activate3_chain);
-
- SetActiveWindow(hWnd1);
- FlushMessages();
- EXPECT_CHAIN(2,4,1,3,1);
- COMPARE_CACHE(Activate4_chain);
-
- SetActiveWindow(hWnd4);
- FlushMessages();
- EXPECT_CHAIN(4,2,1,3,4);
- /* in this test xp and 7 give different results :/ */
- /*COMPARE_CACHE(Activate5_chain);*/
-
- /* move the windows on top with the same order but now using SetWindowPos
*/
- /* note: the zorder of windows change in the same way they change with
SetActiveWindow */
- set_default_zorder();
-
- SetWindowPos(hWnd1, 0, 0,0,0,0,
SWP_NOSENDCHANGING|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW);
- FlushMessages();
- empty_message_cache();
- EXPECT_CHAIN(4,2,1,3,1);
-
- SetWindowPos(hWnd3, 0, 0,0,0,0,
SWP_NOSENDCHANGING|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW);
- FlushMessages();
- empty_message_cache();
- EXPECT_CHAIN(3,4,2,1,3);
-
- SetWindowPos(hWnd2, 0, 0,0,0,0,
SWP_NOSENDCHANGING|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW);
- FlushMessages();
- empty_message_cache();
- EXPECT_CHAIN(2,4,1,3,2);
-
- SetWindowPos(hWnd1, 0, 0,0,0,0,
SWP_NOSENDCHANGING|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW);
- FlushMessages();
- empty_message_cache();
- EXPECT_CHAIN(2,4,1,3,1);
-
- SetWindowPos(hWnd4, 0, 0,0,0,0,
SWP_NOSENDCHANGING|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW);
- FlushMessages();
- empty_message_cache();
- EXPECT_CHAIN(4,2,1,3,4);
-
- /* now do the same thing one more time with SWP_NOACTIVATE */
- set_default_zorder();
-
- SetWindowPos(hWnd1, 0, 0,0,0,0,
SWP_NOSENDCHANGING|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW|SWP_NOACTIVATE);
- FlushMessages();
- empty_message_cache();
- EXPECT_CHAIN(1,4,2,3,4);
-
- SetWindowPos(hWnd3, 0, 0,0,0,0,
SWP_NOSENDCHANGING|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW|SWP_NOACTIVATE);
- FlushMessages();
- empty_message_cache();
- EXPECT_CHAIN(3,1,4,2,4);
-
- SetWindowPos(hWnd2, 0, 0,0,0,0,
SWP_NOSENDCHANGING|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW|SWP_NOACTIVATE);
- FlushMessages();
- empty_message_cache();
- EXPECT_CHAIN(2,3,1,4,4);
-
- SetWindowPos(hWnd1, 0, 0,0,0,0,
SWP_NOSENDCHANGING|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW|SWP_NOACTIVATE);
- FlushMessages();
- empty_message_cache();
- EXPECT_CHAIN(1,2,3,4,4);
-
- SetWindowPos(hWnd4, 0, 0,0,0,0,
SWP_NOSENDCHANGING|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW|SWP_NOACTIVATE);
- FlushMessages();
- EXPECT_CHAIN(4,1,2,3,4);
+ COMPARE_CACHE(activate1to2_chain);
destroy_test_window();
}
START_TEST(SetActiveWindow)
{
- Test_OwnerWindows();
+ Test_msg_simple();
}
